BENTURAN PERADABAN SAMUEL HUNTINGTON PDF
This Thesis is written to discuss the truth of Samuel P. Huntington’s thesis about the clash civilization between Islam and West. This Theorized clash civilization. Jauh sebelum Samuel Huntington menuliskan buku TheClash of Civilization. MenurutQuthb, benturanbenturan itu terjadikarena peradaban Barat yang. Download Citation on ResearchGate | BENTURAN PERADABAN DAN CARUT- MARUT POSTMODERNISME Huntington, Samuel P
|Published (Last):||23 March 2017|
|PDF File Size:||13.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.81 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
However, Kitsikis establishes an integrated civilization comprising these two peoples along with those belonging to the less dominant religions of Shia IslamAlevismand Judaism. In the past, world history was mainly about the struggles between monarchs, nations and ideologies, such as seen within Western civilization. In recent bentkran, the theory of Dialogue Among Civilizationsa response to Huntington’s Clash of Civilizations, has become the center of some international attention.
Some of these countries have clashed with the West and some have not.
Clash of Civilizations
But after the end of the Cold Warworld politics moved into a new phase, epradaban which non-Western civilizations are no longer the exploited recipients of Western civilization but have become additional important actors joining the West to shape and move world history. This conflict dates back as far as the initial thrust of Islam into Europeits eventual expulsion in the Iberian reconquestthe attacks of the Ottoman Turks on Eastern Europe and Vienna, and peradabqn European imperial division of the Islamic nations in the s and s.
The Persian War was took place in BC represent of this hypothesis. In his book Terror and LiberalismPaul Berman argues that distinct cultural boundaries do not exist in the present day. Specifically, he identifies common Chinese and Islamic interests in the areas of weapons proliferation, human rights, and democracy that conflict with those of the West, and feels that these are areas in which the two civilizations will cooperate.
International Politics, 42, pp. The Challenges to America’s National Identity perxdaban Views Read Edit View history. In commemoration of Sita Ram Goel. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Some theorists and writers argued that human rightsliberal samuwland the capitalist damuel market economy had become the only remaining ideological alternative for nations in the post-Cold War world.
It is to set forth descriptive hypothesis as to what the future may be like.
CS1 French-language sources fr Webarchive template wayback links All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from September Articles with weasel words from October All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from November Japan, China and the Four Asian Tigers have modernized in many respects while maintaining traditional or authoritarian societies which distinguish them from the West.
Its political and economic elite must support the move. In the Intermediate Region, therefore, one cannot speak of a civilizational clash or external conflict, but rather an internal conflict, not for cultural domination, but for political succession. Clear and Present Strangers: Manifestations of what he terms the ” Islamic Resurgence ” include the Iranian revolution and the first Gulf War. These conflicts may result from a number of causes, such as: Perhaps the ultimate example of non-Western modernization is Russia, the core state of the Orthodox civilization.
This page was last edited on 12 Decemberat International Politics, 39 2pp. According to Huntington, the West is distinguished from Orthodox Christian countries by its experience of the RenaissanceReformationthe Enlightenment ; by overseas colonialism rather than contiguous expansion and colonialism; and by the infusion of Classical culture through ancient Greece rather than through the continuous trajectory of the Byzantine Empire.
In addition, he cites the fact that many Islamic extremists spent a significant amount of time living or studying in the Western world. The civilization was one of the most influential factors as source of conflict in the past. Turkeywhose political leadership has systematically tried to Westernize the country since the s, is his chief example.
In addition, the clash huntkngton civilizations, for Huntington, represents a development of history. According to Huntington, a torn country must meet three requirements to redefine its civilizational identity.
Core state conflicts can arise out of fault line conflicts when core states become involved. Oxford University Press; The Global Politics of Civilizations”.
Core state conflicts are on a global level between the major states of different civilizations.
Clash of Civilizations – Wikipedia
The great divisions among humankind and the dominating source of conflict will be cultural. Noam Chomsky has criticized the concept of the clash of civilizations as damuel being a new justification for the United States “for any atrocities that they wanted to carry out”, which was required after the Cold War as the Soviet Union was no longer a viable threat.
Archived from the original on The American political scientist Samuel P. Huntington refers to countries that are seeking to affiliate with another civilization as “torn countries”.
Lechner FJ, Boli J, editors. From Oslo to Iraq and the Road Map. The initiative is intended to galvanize collective action across diverse societies to combat extremismto overcome cultural and social barriers between mainly the Western and predominantly Muslim worlds, and to reduce the tensions and polarization between societies which differ in religious and cultural values. Such statements should be clarified or removed.
Public lecture delivered at the University of Innsbruck, Austria, 19 Octoberpublished in: Wars such as those following the break up of Yugoslaviain Chechnyaand between India and Pakistan were cited as evidence of inter-civilizational conflict. Edward Said issued a response to Huntington’s thesis in his article, ” The Clash of Ignorance “. These critics [ who? Huntington argued that future wars would be fought not between countries, but between cultures, and that Islamic extremism would become the biggest threat to world peace.
All these historical and modern factors combined, Huntington wrote briefly in his Foreign Affairs article and in much more detail in his book, would lead to a bloody clash between the Islamic and Western civilizations.